So last week I started talking about consideration. Consideration is the basis of a contract and without it there is no contract. So today’s post focuses on what is good consideration, and then applies it to a complex agreement that many businesses face when dealing with litigation.
What is Good Consideration: Illusion, Value, and Obligation
One party may not hold an unqualified right to ditch out on their side of promise. This is similar to an idea of a gift, where one party is receiving the benefit for nothing; the promises exchanged cannot be illusory. Without the agreement to promise to do something there would be no bargaining, and there would be no way to enforce the promise against the one who bailed out on the contract. In addition, the illusion of paying at an underestimated value to avoid sales tax is illegal. This brings me to my next point about the value of the consideration.
In terms of a set amount, remember in our free market economy everything has value, but not all value is equal. Due to the fact, that one man’s junk is another man’s treasure it is hard to say that there is a “correct” amount for consideration. What is presumed is that people will only make agreements for things they consider worthwhile. Consumers generally have the safety of courts protecting them from deals that “shock the conscience of the court.” In addition many consumer protection laws prevent contracts of adhesion. However, for you business owners, in a B2B sale, you are on your own; if you paid too much for a service or product consider it an expensive lesson.
Lastly, good consideration has to be a new obligation. If a contract is already made, one party cannot use the prior obligation as the basis of a new agreement with the same party.
Example: Value and Taxes – If you choose to sell hand-crafted chopsticks for $0.60 a piece, and sell a 1,000 of them to a restaurant supply store that is your choice. You can negotiate and sell it for $0.10 or $1.00 apiece. There is no right or wrong price for consideration. However, what is wrong is if you keep making sales for $600 and report sales of $500 just to avoid paying taxes.
Final Word: Accord and Satisfaction, Paying to be Free From Obligation
I mentioned last week that consideration can be refraining from doing something. For example, refraining from exercising the right to sue the opposing party that did not perform their obligated duty. In a dispute, where one side has not received its promise there is a breach of contract and the nonbreaching side has the right to sue. The side that broke the contract has an outstanding debt or obligation to the nonbreaching side.
This is where Accord and Satisfaction steps in; it is a concept of purchasing the release from a debt obligation. The accord is the agreement to discharge the obligation and the satisfaction is the consideration. Contractually, what happens is the side that broke the agreement agrees to pay money or settle the dispute, in exchange for the nonbreaching side to give-up its right to sue or drop the suit. This is done because the nonbreaching side does not want be sued and generally the debt-collecting side finds it less costly to collect a sum of money (albeit less than the actual value of the original contract) from the breaching side.
*Disclaimer: This post discusses general legal issues, but does not constitute legal advice in any respect. No reader should act or refrain from acting based on information contained herein without seeking the advice of counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. Ryan K. Hew, Attorney At Law, LLLC expressly disclaims all liability in respect to any actions taken or not taken based on the contents of this post.